Hi Rebekah (and Rob),
more of a technical gripe than anything else.

In the Gallery it says on pages 14/21/22 - 'set removed'. Except they're not, just click relevant the link and there they are. I think that's the case even if you're not logged in.
From Gallery 6 onwards, the dates for all the photos are displayed as "th Nov 0000".

In the webcam sections, the drop-down list doesn't quite work properly:-
1. no matter what page-link you're on it always display the first item in the list, i.e Jan 2008 and Jan 2010.
2. if you've gone to, for example, the 2nd link and you then want to go back and see the 'latest' files (Jan 2010/2008), the only way you can is by modifying the link in the address bar.
3. the webcam archive files open as .wmv files (good, download), but the members archive files only open as .flv files (annoying, difficlut to download).

Sorry to be so picky, but I really love your site, so these little things are a just ...

Blue.

~Thanks for the heads up Blue, I had noticed a couple of the things you mentioned and been meaning to fix them for a while. I have passed some onto Rob as he is the tech wizard/geek and I will have him look at them as soona s he can.

Thanks again for being so 'on the ball'.

Rebekah.xx


_________________

Hi Blue69,

Thanks for bringing these matters to our attention. Some had been on the list of things to do and to be honest had been forgotten about so it was about time for example, that the dates were added to the gallery set. This is a legacy of the old site which originally did not have dates listed with each photoset. When we re-designed a few years ago we began to use the dates but the older sets there were no dates available. This was an arduous task, some dates are only an approximation but they are accurate to a week or so.It was not all bad though as it brought back some fond memories since the earliest sets were from over 8 years ago!

As for the drop-down - I had not noticed this before. As the list defaulted to the latest set this was not selectable so like you say you could not return to the most current month of the archive. This has been fixed now.

Unfortunately the archive is recorded by Camz in flv format and they are not meant for download - only to be viewed in the browser as there are rights issues and so we cannot make these available for full download. The older 1 hour Camz shows were converted into WMV format and are free to download.

I hope this answers your questions, thanks again for your vigilance.

Regards,


Rob.

The Freecorder 4 toolbar is pretty good at capturing most FLV files.
http://applian.com/freecorder4/support/

Blue69

On the one hand, i do think that to find parts of the site that just dont work or files that are missing is a pain in the arse when your are caught up in moments of hot passion and self-indulgence as i believe it is called, but i do feel that there is no legitimate reason why one would need to download files if those files do work and are in the correct place and work when during a wanking session one would need to seek them out. far be it for me to suggest that members would seek to steal their favorite files from Rebekahs site and share them with others for 'personal prestige' because that would b rather inethical when it would b far more honorable to recommend Rebekahs site to others and leave them to discover the delights that are contained within for themselves by joining of their own accord. I have done just that to friends whom i know enjoy a tug while watching qualiity porn but have discovered that every man and woman has their own personal taste in woman and often i have heard, 'nah, not my style..or some such remark.' fair enough!

However i do take the point that it is a hassle to discover problems, and therefore have this sincere and well meant suggestion to make.

Once a week, i believe that the 'Honorable Geek,' or 'Mr Tech,' and Rebekah should sit down and run an examination of the site to check details of its function in order to right problems, generally improve its overall function and discuss what could b done to make it more user friendly and also talk about new ideas for videos and image sets that could b introduced. (forgive me if this is already an established practice.)

If they already perform this function with that regularity, then fine, but i do realise that stuff can get overlooked and naturally it is good that intelligent and observant members do bring miscalibrations to their attention.

Just know that it is because we love u, that we do it!